There are many countries in the world that have banned smoking in public places, including india, ireland, bhutan, australia and france many other countries in the european union have also banned some or all indoor public smoking, including the united kingdom, sweden, italy and finland. As per a research published in an italian newspaper, if public smoking is banned it will reduce approximately 50% of government’s fund on health system to recapitulate, smoke ban is for the betterment of smokers, passive smokers and the government hence it is a wise decision to formulate and enact such laws. Model answer 1: the earlier we can ban smoking in public places, the better it would be for the human kind having foreseen the same, many offices and governing bodies imposed a strict ban on public smoking.
Most fundamentally, the debate about smoking bans should center on private property rights whether you should be allowed to smoke in a bar should be determined by the owner of that bar, not by busybody bureaucrats who think they know how to live everyone’s lives for them. The real reason behind public smoking bans they adopted a libertarian point of view — emphasizing how the government has no business intruding on people’s choices and all those negative. Smoking should be banned in public places essays 1464 words | 6 pages during the past few decades it has come to light that smoking kills the federal government mandates that every pack of cigarettes carry a warning on it that smoking can lead to health problems including death.
A federal ban on smoking in public housing is a good idea it would save the government money “a 2014 cdc study estimated that prohibiting smoking in public housing would yield an annual cost. A government can try to ban anything, but in case of tobacco there are various reasons not to there are people who insist on their right to smoke they might tolerate state-imposed health-advise, but being entirely prohibited from smoking might cause them to no longer vote for the politicians who supported the ban. Smoking bans ha ve bee n shown to substantially reduc e the litter a nd there fore the costs of c leaning up beaches and other outdoor areas,  as well as to improve the overall appearance and attractiveness of the area. Poll: should the irish government ban smoking with the health minister looking to cut the number of smokers to 5 per cent by 2025, would it be easier for the government to ban them altogether. Smoking should not be banned in public places all public places should have smoking and non-smoking sections the smoking section should reflect the size of the smoking population instead of being a token gesture.
The government said people who flouted the ban could face fines the cardiff administration brought in the ban on smoking in indoor public places in april 2007 , ahead of england. Freedom of choice is one main reason it is generally accepted that smoking is bad for health it is also accepted that adults should be able to decide for themselves thus if a person wants to smoke a cigarette and harm himself, he should be able to do so without anyone stopping him passive. Ban smoking advertisements advertisements for cigarette companies should be banned in order not to give the citizens a wrong impression that smoking is cool or hot advertising may come in the form of television advertisement, sponsorship or even cigarette model.
More recently, in october, the city of delray beach, fla, (which already offered smoking cessation courses and insurance discounts for not smoking) banned hiring tobacco users. Smoking bans (or smoke-free laws) in sweden, use of snus, as an alternative to smoking, cancer survivors support the planned smoking ban in order for local government units to strictly implement the regulations set by the tobacco regulation act of 2003. While the government has the power to enact public smoking bans, there is no legitimate basis for laws restricting private smoking we may as well pass laws prohibiting people from eating too much, or sleeping too little, or skipping medication, or taking on high-stress jobs.
Why not just ban smoking the federal government is banking on a $53 billion revenue gain from lifting tobacco excise over four years, which suggests the move will only marginally reduce smoking. The effects on smoking on a person are so awful and extreme, that there really is no reason it should be legal for anyone lung disease, cancers, heart disease, and emphysema are just some of the thousands of harmful effects should the government ban smoking essay smoking. The government will listen very carefully to what parliament has to say on the important principle as to whether the government should have the power to legislate to prevent smoking in cars when.